WHEN WILL VIRTUALDJ INCLUDE APPLE MUSIC
Posted Tue 25 Mar 25 @ 4:26 pm
DELESLIE wrote :
WHEN WILL VIRTUALDJ INCLUDE APPLE MUSIC
:-D
Posted Tue 25 Mar 25 @ 4:32 pm
LOL - That escalated quickly!
Posted Tue 25 Mar 25 @ 5:17 pm
Hopefully never.
Posted Tue 25 Mar 25 @ 7:46 pm
Hopefully soon
Posted Tue 25 Mar 25 @ 8:14 pm
I don't have a horse in this race, but it seems odd that the most versatile DJ software is left out of the Apple party.
Posted Tue 25 Mar 25 @ 9:49 pm
zzzonedotnet wrote :
I don't have a horse in this race, but it seems odd that the most versatile DJ software is left out of the Apple party.
My guess is because VDJ allows offline caching of music files from streaming services and Apple, being the walled garden that it is, doesn't want to allow that.
I just want Apple Music integration so I can quit paying an extra $20 for Tidal. I own my music but like to use Tidal for requests I don't have or the 1st dance song that is only going to be played once ever. But it will need to allow offline cache before I would make the switch.
Posted Wed 26 Mar 25 @ 12:40 pm
DJ Stygma wrote :
My guess is because VDJ allows offline caching of music files from streaming services and Apple, being the walled garden that it is, doesn't want to allow that.
zzzonedotnet wrote :
I don't have a horse in this race, but it seems odd that the most versatile DJ software is left out of the Apple party.
My guess is because VDJ allows offline caching of music files from streaming services and Apple, being the walled garden that it is, doesn't want to allow that.
The Deezer integration also doesn't support download/caching, so that is probably not the reason
My guess is that Atomix/VDJ simply wasn't invited this time around :)
But if it turns out that there is an open API than everyone can use, and Apple doesn't charge the DJ software vendors for it, then I'm pretty sure Atomix will create support as well :)
Posted Wed 26 Mar 25 @ 12:59 pm
I'm almost certain the ability to cache isn't the issue - that would be a term that's negotiated by them and fully controllable by automix devs on the VirtualDJ side (they would just disallow caching for the Apple Music provider).
It's hard to say what happened here without inside knowledge but it's probably already on the Devs radar.
It's hard to say what happened here without inside knowledge but it's probably already on the Devs radar.
Posted Wed 26 Mar 25 @ 12:59 pm
klausmogensen wrote :
The Deezer integration also doesn't support download/caching, so that is probably not the reason
My guess is that Atomix/VDJ simply wasn't invited this time around :)
But if it turns out that there is an open API than everyone can use, and Apple doesn't charge the DJ software vendors for it, then I'm pretty sure Atomix will create support as well :)
DJ Stygma wrote :
My guess is because VDJ allows offline caching of music files from streaming services and Apple, being the walled garden that it is, doesn't want to allow that.
zzzonedotnet wrote :
I don't have a horse in this race, but it seems odd that the most versatile DJ software is left out of the Apple party.
My guess is because VDJ allows offline caching of music files from streaming services and Apple, being the walled garden that it is, doesn't want to allow that.
The Deezer integration also doesn't support download/caching, so that is probably not the reason
My guess is that Atomix/VDJ simply wasn't invited this time around :)
But if it turns out that there is an open API than everyone can use, and Apple doesn't charge the DJ software vendors for it, then I'm pretty sure Atomix will create support as well :)
Thanks for the clarification, I am new to VDJ so it was just a guess. I love your videos, they have helped a lot with the transition from Serato and seeing how powerful VDJ really is.
Posted Thu 27 Mar 25 @ 1:50 pm
No, VDJ allows caching only for TIDAL. So Apple could be integrated like deezer or others ...
Quote :
My guess is because VDJ allows offline caching of music files from streaming services and Apple, being the walled garden that it is, doesn't want to allow that.
I just want Apple Music integration so I can quit paying an extra $20 for Tidal. I own my music but like to use Tidal for requests I don't have or the 1st dance song that is only going to be played once ever. But it will need to allow offline cache before I would make the switch.
I just want Apple Music integration so I can quit paying an extra $20 for Tidal. I own my music but like to use Tidal for requests I don't have or the 1st dance song that is only going to be played once ever. But it will need to allow offline cache before I would make the switch.
Posted 3 days ago @ 8:02 am